Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/bgd-12-7017-2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/bgd-12-7017-2015
12 May 2015
 | 12 May 2015
Status: this preprint was under review for the journal BG but the revision was not accepted.

Methane distribution, flux, and budget in the East China Sea and Yellow Sea

M.-S. Sun, G.-L. Zhang, X.-P. Cao, X.-Y. Mao, J. Li, and W.-W. Ye

Abstract. We measured dissolved methane (CH4) concentrations, saturations, and fluxes from sea into air and from sediment into water during cruises in March, May, August, October, and December of 2011 in the East China Sea (ECS) and the Yellow Sea (YS). CH4 concentrations had obvious spatial and seasonal variability due to the complex effects of different water masses and other variables. Maximal CH4 concentration, sea–air and sediment–water fluxes all occurred during the summer. CH4 concentration decreased gradually from the coastal area to the open sea, and high levels of CH4 generally appeared near the Changjiang Estuary and outside the Hangzhou Bay. During early spring and winter, CH4 had a uniform distribution from the surface to the bottom, but CH4 concentration increased gradually with depth during other seasons. The subsurface CH4 maximum occurred at a depth of about 200 m during May, October, and December. The CH4 level at the bottom was generally higher than at the surface, and this was enhanced during summer due to hypoxia in the bottom waters. Changjiang-diluted water, the Kuroshio Current, and the Taiwan Warm Current Water affected the geographic distribution of CH4 in the ECS, and these water bodies contributed about 3.45, 2.97, 14.60 mol s−1 of CH4 during summer and 2.11, 8.58, 5.20 mol s−1 CH4 during winter, respectively. Sediment was also a significant source of dissolved CH4 in the ECS, and we estimated the average sediment–water CH4 flux of the ECS and YS as about 1.02 μmol m−2 d−1. We also used a box model to calculate the CH4 budget in the ECS. The results suggested that in situ CH4 production in the water column was the major source of CH4, and accounted for 0.21 μmol m−3 day−1 during summer and 0.11 μmol m−3 day−1 during winter. Air–sea exchange was the major sink of CH4 in the ECS. We estimated total CH4 emission from the ECS and YS as about 4.45 x 109 mol during 2011. Our results indicated that the ECS and YS were active areas for CH4 production and emission.

M.-S. Sun, G.-L. Zhang, X.-P. Cao, X.-Y. Mao, J. Li, and W.-W. Ye
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
M.-S. Sun, G.-L. Zhang, X.-P. Cao, X.-Y. Mao, J. Li, and W.-W. Ye
M.-S. Sun, G.-L. Zhang, X.-P. Cao, X.-Y. Mao, J. Li, and W.-W. Ye

Viewed

Total article views: 1,175 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
686 432 57 1,175 234 37 54
  • HTML: 686
  • PDF: 432
  • XML: 57
  • Total: 1,175
  • Supplement: 234
  • BibTeX: 37
  • EndNote: 54
Views and downloads (calculated since 12 May 2015)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 12 May 2015)

Cited

Saved

Latest update: 18 Apr 2024
Download
Short summary
Obvious seasonal variations of the distribution and emission of methane in the ECS and YS were reported based on data collected during five cruises in 2011. A box model was used to calculate the methane budget in the ECS, identify the main sources and sinks of dissolved methane in this area, and estimate the contribution of different sources to total methane quantitatively. It indicated that the most important source of methane in the ECS was in situ production in the water column.
Altmetrics